<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asrock ION 330HT as Wireless Access Point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bokhorst.biz/3395/computers-and-internet/asrock-ion-330ht-as-wireless-access-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bokhorst.biz/3395/computers-and-internet/asrock-ion-330ht-as-wireless-access-point/</link>
	<description>Bloggers zijn blijer!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:23:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel</title>
		<link>http://blog.bokhorst.biz/3395/computers-and-internet/asrock-ion-330ht-as-wireless-access-point/comment-page-1/#comment-3713</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 10:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokhorst.biz/?p=3395#comment-3713</guid>
		<description>To start with, you should do the first step of the how-to to discover your exact adapter type. After that you&#039;ll have to check if your adapter is supported by the Linux wireless drivers and if so, select the correct driver (see build/install).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To start with, you should do the first step of the how-to to discover your exact adapter type. After that you&#8217;ll have to check if your adapter is supported by the Linux wireless drivers and if so, select the correct driver (see build/install).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sukhvinder Singh</title>
		<link>http://blog.bokhorst.biz/3395/computers-and-internet/asrock-ion-330ht-as-wireless-access-point/comment-page-1/#comment-3712</link>
		<dc:creator>Sukhvinder Singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 10:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokhorst.biz/?p=3395#comment-3712</guid>
		<description>I am having a Broadcom 4312 driver in my dell inspiron 1545 will your setup will work in my PC, Kindly give your suggestion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am having a Broadcom 4312 driver in my dell inspiron 1545 will your setup will work in my PC, Kindly give your suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.bokhorst.biz/3395/computers-and-internet/asrock-ion-330ht-as-wireless-access-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2173</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 19:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokhorst.biz/?p=3395#comment-2173</guid>
		<description>In fact, I have a similar setup. DSL router + firewall + DHCP server and an internal (wired) 192.168.1.x network. My first approach was to create one big internal network (wired and wireless in the same network, sharing the same DHCP server, behind the same firewall). 

I didn&#039;t get this to work and went for 2 separate networks. Perhaps it will work with DHCP relay, my old AP, a Linksys WAP54G does basically the same. I think it&#039;s better to create an extra network, eg. 192.168.0.x for wireless. You can easily achieve this with dnsmasq.

I&#039;m not sure how this situation should work on one big network: a wired device, let&#039;s say 192.168.1.2 wants to connect to a wireless device, let&#039;s say 192.168.1.4. How does it &quot;know&quot; it has to send it&#039;s request to 192.168.1.3, the wired interface of the AP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, I have a similar setup. DSL router + firewall + DHCP server and an internal (wired) 192.168.1.x network. My first approach was to create one big internal network (wired and wireless in the same network, sharing the same DHCP server, behind the same firewall). </p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t get this to work and went for 2 separate networks. Perhaps it will work with DHCP relay, my old AP, a Linksys WAP54G does basically the same. I think it&#8217;s better to create an extra network, eg. 192.168.0.x for wireless. You can easily achieve this with dnsmasq.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how this situation should work on one big network: a wired device, let&#8217;s say 192.168.1.2 wants to connect to a wireless device, let&#8217;s say 192.168.1.4. How does it &#8220;know&#8221; it has to send it&#8217;s request to 192.168.1.3, the wired interface of the AP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel</title>
		<link>http://blog.bokhorst.biz/3395/computers-and-internet/asrock-ion-330ht-as-wireless-access-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2169</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokhorst.biz/?p=3395#comment-2169</guid>
		<description>You could try to &lt;a href=&quot;https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/i386/dhcp3-relay&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;relay DCHP requests&lt;/a&gt;, but I&#039;ve no idea about how to do the routing without a separate sub-net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could try to <a  href="https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/i386/dhcp3-relay" rel="nofollow">relay DCHP requests</a>, but I&#8217;ve no idea about how to do the routing without a separate sub-net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZioNemo</title>
		<link>http://blog.bokhorst.biz/3395/computers-and-internet/asrock-ion-330ht-as-wireless-access-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2165</link>
		<dc:creator>ZioNemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokhorst.biz/?p=3395#comment-2165</guid>
		<description>I have a slightly different setup:

A separate firewall/DHCP server.
A Zotac IONITX-P-E (just like John above).

I would like to use the Zotac (also) as a transparent access point (no masquerading).
Is it possible?
What should I change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a slightly different setup:</p>
<p>A separate firewall/DHCP server.<br />
A Zotac IONITX-P-E (just like John above).</p>
<p>I would like to use the Zotac (also) as a transparent access point (no masquerading).<br />
Is it possible?<br />
What should I change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blog.bokhorst.biz/3395/computers-and-internet/asrock-ion-330ht-as-wireless-access-point/comment-page-1/#comment-2151</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokhorst.biz/?p=3395#comment-2151</guid>
		<description>Hi Marcel,

Thanks, this gave me a nice jump start. I have a Zotac IONITX-P-E, with the same wireless card.
To enable 802.11n, in hostapd.conf you should also set:
ieee80211n=1
wmm_enabled=1
ht_capab=[HT40-][HT40+][SHORT-GI-40][TX-STBC][RX-STBC1][DSSS_CCK-40]

For other cards, use &#039;iw list&#039; to check your cards HT capabilities (ht_capab).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marcel,</p>
<p>Thanks, this gave me a nice jump start. I have a Zotac IONITX-P-E, with the same wireless card.<br />
To enable 802.11n, in hostapd.conf you should also set:<br />
ieee80211n=1<br />
wmm_enabled=1<br />
ht_capab=[HT40-][HT40+][SHORT-GI-40][TX-STBC][RX-STBC1][DSSS_CCK-40]</p>
<p>For other cards, use &#8216;iw list&#8217; to check your cards HT capabilities (ht_capab).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chunk1970</title>
		<link>http://blog.bokhorst.biz/3395/computers-and-internet/asrock-ion-330ht-as-wireless-access-point/comment-page-1/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Chunk1970</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 10:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokhorst.biz/?p=3395#comment-848</guid>
		<description>THanks Marcel,

This has got my Asrock running nicely on Ubuntu 9.10 Kernel 2.6.31-20.
The only thing I had to do differently was that I had to use iptables rather the route to configure my wireless lan to the internet ie.
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
This nicely redirects all traffic from the wireless network through to the wired network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THanks Marcel,</p>
<p>This has got my Asrock running nicely on Ubuntu 9.10 Kernel 2.6.31-20.<br />
The only thing I had to do differently was that I had to use iptables rather the route to configure my wireless lan to the internet ie.<br />
iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -s 192.168.0.0/24 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE<br />
This nicely redirects all traffic from the wireless network through to the wired network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel</title>
		<link>http://blog.bokhorst.biz/3395/computers-and-internet/asrock-ion-330ht-as-wireless-access-point/comment-page-1/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 08:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokhorst.biz/?p=3395#comment-656</guid>
		<description>Actually I haven&#039;t used the access point very much, because it appeared to be unstable when I use &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_file_system&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NFS&lt;/a&gt; (the PC/Ubuntu stops responding completely; this doesn&#039;t happen when I use the wired connection) and the wireless range was limited (the Asrock has no external antenna).

I didn&#039;t see your deauthentication/authentication problem. Maybe it has to do with encryption. I used WPA2 only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I haven&#8217;t used the access point very much, because it appeared to be unstable when I use <a  href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_file_system" rel="nofollow">NFS</a> (the PC/Ubuntu stops responding completely; this doesn&#8217;t happen when I use the wired connection) and the wireless range was limited (the Asrock has no external antenna).</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t see your deauthentication/authentication problem. Maybe it has to do with encryption. I used WPA2 only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.bokhorst.biz/3395/computers-and-internet/asrock-ion-330ht-as-wireless-access-point/comment-page-1/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bokhorst.biz/?p=3395#comment-634</guid>
		<description>Hi Marcel,

Nice blog! I have done basically the same thing and found this posting very informative. I&#039;m using a Dell Mini 9 running Ubuntu 9.10. It is acting as a NAT router/firewall (UFW with NAT rules), DHCP server (dhcp3-server) and AP (hostapd with Atheros AR928x based card). My question is related to the performance of your AP. While my AP configuration seems to work for the most part, my clients drop their connection regularly. Based on syslog this seems to be due to some kind of deauthentication/authentication issue. The only way to get the clients to reconnect is to manually restart hostapd.

I&#039;m curious to know if you have seen this behavior on your AP as well. If you have, how have you resolved the issue?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Marcel,</p>
<p>Nice blog! I have done basically the same thing and found this posting very informative. I&#8217;m using a Dell Mini 9 running Ubuntu 9.10. It is acting as a NAT router/firewall (UFW with NAT rules), DHCP server (dhcp3-server) and AP (hostapd with Atheros AR928x based card). My question is related to the performance of your AP. While my AP configuration seems to work for the most part, my clients drop their connection regularly. Based on syslog this seems to be due to some kind of deauthentication/authentication issue. The only way to get the clients to reconnect is to manually restart hostapd.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to know if you have seen this behavior on your AP as well. If you have, how have you resolved the issue?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

